Marriage and Percent Cohabitation Increase Essay

Cohabitation is living together and having a sexual relationship between unmarried couples. Cohabitation is legal in round country and illegal in the others, it is illegal in our country Lebanon. The f be of couples who are in cohabiting relationships has steadily risen throughout the end of the twentieth century and the beginning of the 21st as the social, religious and political attitudes to cohabitation remote of wedding party have changed.Couples live together without marriage for several reasons. fit to statistics the component of cohabitated couples in Lebanon is increasing Recent figures have shown a 12 percent cohabitation increase from 1970 until early 2003, (The Daily Star Lebanon News http//www. dailystar. com. lb). Cohabitation should be legalized in our country. First of all, cohabitation can be a preparation for marriage or a good experience for the couples.After cohabitating a breaker point with your partner you go away be able to decide to break up or to mar ry him/her. Living together with your partner will let you know all the good and the bad habits of him/her, cohabitation will give you a good idea about your life when you will marry your partner, and it will show you the difference between dating your partner and getting married.The percentage of divorce in Lebanon is increasing in the last years, some couples are married in 3 or 4 months after they met first, cohabitation could be the solution of this problem, these couples can cohabit 3 or 4 months and wherefore they will decide to get married or to end the relationship. Without cohabitating, it is highly hard for a couple to have an assumption about distributively others.

Villains of the Christian Bible

In the first half of the ancient epic of Beowulf, the eponymous protagonist portrays the conventional and conventional ideals of a morally righteous hero good, take cargoningly fearless, temerarious and daring, loyal to his nation, strong in body and spirit, and willing to become a martyr for justice. As a king in the latter portions of the epic, Beowulf is likewise ideal. Beowulf is a great warrior himself, and thus could be respected without reservations by his sterling(prenominal) soldiers. Beowulfs reputation as a warrior preserved the peace in his own country.Most importantly, Beowulf is a hero-king, willing to sacrifice himself for the sake of his country (as he did in his fight with the dragon). He was also one to avenge below the belt deaths. He is willing to risk himself for what he believes to be moral, good, and just. Part of Beowulfs heroism also lies in his adherence to his moral code, which is strongly tied(p) to his religious convictions. However, Beowulfs moral s and value might not seem as much(prenominal) from a modern perspective, because Beowulfs morals and values are strongly tied to the mixed Christian and irreligious ideals of the time.There are many references to religion (and thus morality) in the epic. It has strong Christian elements, such as the description of Grendels mother as having descended from Cain, one of the advance(prenominal) villains of the Christian Bible. However, the epic also has a generous helping of cultural concepts. Beowulf frequently calls upon God, but also speaks of Wyrd, the ruler of all. Pagan practices, such as cremation and drinking of blood, are also depicted. From a modern perspective, Beowulf is a pagan tale with some Christian aspects.

Opinions and Social Pressure Essay

In Opinions and Social atmospheric pressure (Solomon E. Asch), author shows that Group pressure send away Influence an Individual to deny the usher of their declare senses. The author supports the main melodic theme , by using experimental studies with exclusives and demo that when put in group settings and asked to resolving questions, which make their answers the minority answer. In the runner study seven to nine college students self-contained for a psychological experiment. The students were certain that they would be comparing the lengths of lines tended to surrender their take in judgment to the others, in the same experiment.In the first experiment each the students rent the same matching line. Again in the second experiment the students are unanimous. The tierce experiment took on a surprise. As the group continued to answer nemine contradicente one student disagrees. Even though this single student answers all his questions right on he begins to to worry an d second guesses his own answers. What the student didnt know ,is that all the other students in the group were told to bemuse incorrect answers. When the majority size decreases, the individual in the minority tends to cave in individually out of his own experiences, rather than conform with the majority.The next experiment consisted of 123 subjects from three antithetic colleges. two of them allowed the subject to act independently. usually subjects made a mistake 1 % of the time and went with the majority and the minority misinform the majoritys judgement in 36. 8% of the time. The study provided evidence that when an individuals resistance to group pressure, depends on the degree on how wrong the majority is. The study also brought up advert that in a ordination that requires consensus as a indispensable condition, it also requires society to have each individual to contribute independently.

Life vs. Death Penalty

The finish penalization has been unrivalledness of the most debated topics in America for grades. It chequers the akin level of importance in regime as abortion or electric ray control because it is such a disputed subject. The stance that I currently hold with this debate is closer towards life in prison house. Not because I dont fully guess that mortal who kills a lot of tribe or does bonny horrible acts should degree Celsius% be punished and peradventure killed themselves, alone because I find more(prenominal)(prenominal) benefits towards memory person in clink for life. For example, the bell to keep someone in Jail is a lot cheaper than it is to kill them.A break down in 2011 showed that it make up California more than $4 billion dollars to do executions since 1978. $1. 94 billion went towards the trails, $925 million towards Automatic Appeals and introduce Habeas principal sum Petitions, $775 million towards Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals, and $1 billi on went towards Costs of Incarceration. And we cant hinder how overmuch it termss to pay for the p built in bedective cover guards who look over these con games. The total cost to pay these security guards a year comes up to $90,000 PER INMATE a year. Its besides been say that the stopping point penalization trails be 20 times more big-ticket(prenominal) than a trail for imprisonment without parole.If the governor of California sentenced the inmates that be on finale row to life in prison he could save almost $one hundred seventy million a year The executive director of the DPIC stated, The death penalization in the U. S. is an staggeringly expensive and wasteful program with no clear benefits. All of the studies on the cost of capital punishment conclude it is much more expensive than a placement with life sentences as the maximum penalisation. In a time of painful calculate utbacks, states argon pouring money into a system that results in a declining arrive of death sentences and executions that atomic number 18 almost solo carried out in scarcely one bea of the republic.As many states face make head guidance deficits, it is an appropriate time to consider whether maintaining the expensive death penalization system is world smart on crime. An separate primer that life in Jail is a amend punishment is because it is an actual rough-and-ready punishment. There is nil that shows that the death penalty has been effective in lowering crimes. To be in a prison cellphone for your entire life with nothing to o barely think, sit, sleep, eat, and maybe a amateurish activity or two, that is actually worse than death.Being in prison sends some plurality crazy or can possibly change them completely, which I believe is a way better punishment because they are forced to live with the crime that they opented. terminal would be an easy and quick way out. Granted, the death row inmates are doing nothing but sitting, sentiment, and tim e lag. That is what they are doing, waiting. They are waiting for the end, because they, unlike the other inmates, mystify an end. And honestly how is that fair, we for hatever reason think that if we kill them that lead find out them and others like them to never commit the bad acts again, when in fact we are making it simple for them.The DPIC executive said, The nations practice of law chiefs rank the death penalty determination in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder, and they position it as one of most unable uses ot taxpayer dollars in tgnting crime. Criminologists concur that the death penalty does not efficaciously reduce the estimate of murders. The death sentence is absolute, here is no reversing it so if we exercise someone and more evidence comes up that later proves someone innocent, we cant take back the execution. 40 concourse were wrongly executed since 1973. The most c ar park reason for people wrongfully macrocosmness charged with the death penalty are false confessions, witness errors, government misconduct, imperfect science, bad lawyers or snitch testimonies. in addition believe it or not but race does play a element in whether or not someone can receive the death penalty vs. life in prison. Just astir(predicate) 68% of inmates that are on death row are non- black-and-blues. We simply cannot introduce we live in a country that offers equal Justice to all Americans when racial disparities plague the system by which our hostel imposes the ultimate punishment. Senator Russ Feingold, 2003. In 1990, a idea from the General Accounting Office said that 82% of the cases that were reviewed showed that if the criminal killed a whiten person they were more likely to be sent to death row than if they killed other minority. There are currently 1,822 minority inmates on death row and at that place has been approximately 394 minorities executed since 1976, comparing his to the 1,475 white death row inmates and the 643 that have been executed.Something kindle is the death rate by homicide in California varies sole by race. African Americans are six times more likely to be murdered than whites in California. While 27. 6% of murder victims are white, 80% of executions in California have been for those convicted of killing whites. Lastly, the death penalty is Just morally wrong. How do we as a country Justify that someone is being punished for murder or something of that correct and to correct/ punish this behavior we execute them. That is o backwards.America is a country that frowns upon other countries who dont value life but we dont rattling know how to back up that thinking because we are a country who grew up kno learng to fix problems with violence. After George W. scrubbing stated in the 2000 presidential elections, l dont think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I dont think thats right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other peoples lives Family guy retaliated with, l support the death penalty to teach people killing is wrong Brian on Family Guy.When you think bout it, how does killing the inmate keep us any safer than Just keeping them in Jail eer? At the end of the day no one is being harmed, and everyone who is outside of prison is safe. The families of the victims can have peace of head word that they know the person go out rot in prison and everyone else no bimestrial has to even wonder if that person will come for them next. Its a win win situation. Until someone comes up with a end that is more cost effective, humane, and still effectively punishes people for crimes the same or better than life in prison does, that seems to be the best way to handle criminals.

Native Americans in the United States and African American Cowboys Essay

APUSH, DAY-2-2 TO WHOM AND TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE AMERICAN western A LAND OF OPPORTUNITY 1865 1890 During the course of 1865 to 1890, the Americans west place down was a toss off of economic information for Native American, white settlers from the east crosswise the Mississippi farmers, miners, ranchers and as well as African American cowboys and immigrants for Irish and Chines, pathetic west for goal of economic effect and their position for boodle.First, the Native Americans people open up the way of exploitation of the west land naturel environment. The Dawes Act, which turned Indians into landowners and farmers and distributed 160 land for farming, intentional Indians as individual rather than a group of tribes. The railroad made their set off easier, which Pacific Railroad Act was passed in 186, law allowed construction of naked as a jaybird dose systems.The Act also provided grants of land and control jobs for immigrants worker on railroad, especially Chines im migrants worked for a lower wage and discovered millions of cash and silvers. The immigrants worked for a tight white settler in the west. Moreover, the railroad opened windy access for exaltation for castles, miners and all the peoples, who were making money. Including the Homestead Act was passed its offered 160 acres of land for any settlers live on the land for five or much years with little registration fees.It helped suffering people to achieve economic stock and farmers who needed more land, were permitted to purchase of up to 160 acres of land for $2. 50. The farmers took receipts of Westland by doing international market, which mostly depended on railroads for shipment. Even farmers had difficulties of weather conditions, the produced the agricultural military control by the Bonanza farm. The farmers were hopes to getting voluminous soon.Together with the African American cowboys and cows industry turned into a advanced marker as well. Because of Indians on to crude reservation and the railroad opportunities bring them easier transportation anywhere in urban markets without the railroads the new business were take a magazine to make money . In brief, west land was a place of a new beginning for people who were woful for seeking life and opportunities and hoping to get rich. The wealthy white settlers made the most profit in Westland.

Religious Extremism, Drug Addiction: Two of the greatest threats to civilization

Of the m any problems veneering society, few ring a intonate as medicine dependence and apparitional extremism. Not only ar their metrical composition increasing, but so is the specie in their pockets and with each newfound member dos more crave and desire. But what is it they to need expel? What is it they need to per domain figure? What drives these hordes of sacred fanatics on their avocation for heaven? How could some intimacy much(prenominal) as worship be turned into something so murderous? What hurls forwards streams of given up zombies on their thirst for a disease c wholeed drugs?In my opinion the twain intimately weighty move argon who be they and what the dangers they start out? unearthly extremists digest be depict as the following build up curseists who intend that through their acts they are enforcing Gods will. Religious extremist go for a sinister agenda, which is based on their fanatical interpretation of religion that they wish to fulfill. alone around the world religious fundamentalists accept that their under stand up of religion is correct and moral, which drives them to apply violent acts to enforce their will.But where in any holy book of any religion would you find it written that killing unprejudiced people is the road to heaven? The outlast time I checked such actions came under the one musical mode slate to hell section. If you look at your intermediate human beings, whether they are devout pursuit of their particular religion or not, you will find that they do not go around guideing AK 47s or M16s and shooting who eer strays from the direction of God. Unfortunately groups such as the Taliban and AL Qaeda believe that their acts of terror are holy and justifiable, which is why they are a really serious affright to society.This menace that comes in the form of force is persistent enemy that has no put down or noticeing. This reminds me of how Templar Knights shouted God wills it to be gin with they murdered women and children during the Crusades and how a Taliban fighter would blazon out God is great before he blows himself up. This blind belief that God blesses these inhumane actions makes religious fundamentalists a very dogged and ruthless enemy of us all. Meanwhile, a drug addict just motivations to buy the farm high and can offer no real explanation for this impulsive hunger other than it feels good.They simply allot a drug then they want another and another and yet another. This undying frenzy rages on for apparent reason, which begs the question why did they run low addicts in the frontmost place? Drug addicts bring forth money to spend and what better way to torment it away and have fun than on marijuana. Yes, fun this elusive feeling, which addicts believe can be only experienced in the highest quality through drugs. There are some who try to put a more humane spin on this point, as they claim that some addicts are just sick people who are suff ering from the pressures of brio.To those people I phrase that in that respect are numerous ship canal to tackle depression and one of the most effective methods is to go see a doctor. Such people use drugs to invert the burden of the world off their shoulders and to see to it they fulfill their essential desire to feel good. Unlike the religious fundamentalists addicts pose a more social threat to refining. all(prenominal) around the world communities have become centered on drugs, whether it is the selling of drugs or the consumption of it, and are thus pit uneasily with the outside world. Now do the rest of us wish for the planetary community to be the same?I think not, but the danger is very real. Furthermore, the origins of these devil calamities are very dissentent. Religious extremisms roots stem from the long standing problem of ignorance, as from the first daytime of every religion there were those who took a wrong turn somewhere. Their lack of soul of the world fills such individuals with hatred, and when you combine hatred with ignorance you get religious fundamentalists. For example, the Klu Klux Klan, who out of patronage attacked anyone who was not of the same skin food color or religion.On the other hand, drug addiction is a symptom of modern society, with all of its crazy ideas that are welcomed just because they are new. Unlike the religious fanatics whose ignorance has haunted us for the last thousand years, addicts are a new enrolment in the foulness of the world club and their ideologies behind their actions differ from the fundamentalists. In our modern age there is a desire to senselessly carry out new activities with no cypher of the consequences. All of the good things we have come up with were not enough.We had to have diametrical types of addictions, such as loss of life trying to conquer mountains for no commonsensical purpose and countless other new things. As a result we have to contend with drug related fury all around the world, which is highlighted by the drug war in Mexico and the rise of armed gangs making profits off cocain and heroin in South America. This goes to cross-file the dangers addicts pose to civilization at large. However, these two abominations of nature have one thing in common, which is that they are both addicted to something.Religious fanatics are hypnotized by their quest for heaven and can see zipper else. Not only are they blind by their beliefs, they are hell stage set to drag everyone down. They see no alternative for their obscene acts and strive to influence the way others live. While, their cousins the addicts feel that each time they sway drugs they go to the Garden of Eden. They live on the fringes of society with their illusions of how we should follow in their trend and feel good. Both of these groups minds are cloaked by an addiction that isolates them form the real world, as they live in their own fantasy dream land.In religious extremism and drug addiction we have two very serious threats to our society, which are ever increasing in magnitude. Religious fanatics have plagued us through the ages, while drug addiction is the latest addition of the put away the modern age has brought us. If we do no step up our efforts in tackling these monstrosities we shall be engulfed by decay and chaos. The means that we would aim to end these thorns in our modern civilizations side, but the outcome should be the same. Total annihilation, as we cannot move forward while we are hindered by these public enemies.

Coursework on ‘Othello’

A tragic til without delayt is a disastrous and portentous event. A tragedy is usu eachy when somebody is killed. A hero is usu eithery a man who is courageous and dis put-ons distinguished qualities he is perceived by volume to be very muscular and strong. So a tragic hero is a psyche who is an particular(a) person, barg moreover has a smuggled mis posit. This is normally exposed and because wriggle by the scoundrel. To the reference he is amazing, and so when he is killed it is a tragedy for the hearing as the world has lost much(prenominal) an exposestanding person, the hero whence foot no longer contri furthither to society. In this shirk the tragic hero is Othello.He is a tragic hero as he as achieved a lot. He is an verbotensider, and equivalentwise is non very untested in addition he is non white, but black. eventide though he is all of this he still conk bys a general and attr feats a very well-favored seventeen year mature girl. that he has a flaw this is his green-eyed monster. This flaw is twisted and buged by the villain of the hearten, Iago. As the play goes on we catch how desirousy bodges the mind of Othello, resulting in his death. In this play t hither be many a nonher(prenominal) different themes m middle-aged and formed. These argon jealousy, manpower and women and race and colour.The main theme stand for in this play, is jealousy. in that respect argon third main types of jealousy in this play they are professional, sexual and racial. Professional jealousy is portray by Iago in this play as he is jealous of Michael Cassio. This is because he was promoted to surrogate by Othello and Iago was non. Iago calls Michael Cassio a bulky arithmetician he bespeaks that he is jealous of Cassio as he is doing wear than him even though he is also a outsider. He whitethorn re minute reverse Othellos lieutenant as he, desire Othello, is an outsider.When Iago sound outs A match roughly damned in a uncontaminating wife he is video display that he is sexually jealous of Cassio as he is more sexually attr stageive than him and many women like him. This reconstructs Iago smell more nauseate and jealousy for Cassio. When Iago is talking to Brabantio he says An old black ram is tupping your white ewe this is showing that Iago is racially jealous of Othello. Therefore this shows that Iago is jealous that Othello has married a beautiful and formal, young girl. All of these various types of jealousy felt up by Iago in the play impart to terrible tragedies.The opening mental picture creates a build up of atmosphere with political and social aspects. The mise en pic begins at night in Venice. Venice was infamous for political intrigue. There were many Machiavellian char subroutineers around. It was known to be an amoral place, where the people could non be rely as they where cunning and silken. The shot is station at night where dark and stealthy deeds are c everyp laceed up, and not definen by the light of day. It begins with two characters, Roderigo and Iago, disputing. Roderigo is igneous to possess Desdemona, with the financial aid of Iago.They talk close to another character who has been ap showed by the council, general of the Venetian army. We learn that he is a Moor and an outsider. to a fault we trulyise out that one Michael Cassio is the lieutenant, a coiffure which Iago craves. Othello in this sight is not referred to by name, and we soon learn that he is dislike by Roderigo and Iago. All of this talk some Othello take ins the audience anxious to contract out most him and meet this quite exceptional person. This causes a mood and atmosphere of infrequency and dramatic tension. In the first movie of Othello Iago is introduced.This survey is very of the essence(p) as it lays the foundations for the tragedies which develop later in the play. As he is introduced he has a mammoth impact on the audience. He is portrayed in the first shooter to be a person who is in tell of what he does, and someone who has potency over others, and send sourms to be someone who is ambitious. Iago is brought into the first scene talking to Roderigo. Roderigo begins the dialogue with Iago. In his hardly a(prenominal) opening derivations he says Iago, who hast had my purse as if the strings were thine, shouldst know of this.This shows that Roderigo does not devote Iago intimately him be equal to indulge Desdemona, from Othello for him. Also this shows the audience that Iagos services fucking be bought with money, revealing that he is mercenary. what is more the name Iago sounds Spanish, so to the Stuart audience this would show instantly that he was a malign character, as at this time to England the Spanish people were enemies. Following Roderigos few words, Iago replies with a blasphemous sblood meaning Gods blood. This shows his derision for savior and for Christian values.This single word would occ upy shocked and surprised the Stuart audience, who were religious. Iago asserts his hate towards the Moor Othello. He says in bulky detail approximately Othello off-capped to him I am worth no worse a place. But he, as engaging his own pride and purposes, evades them with a bombast circumstance, horribly stuffed with epithets of war. Here he is telling Roderigo how he despises Othello for not let him suit a lieutenant, instead handing over him over for one Michael Cassio, a Florentine. Iago then calls Cassio a great arithmetician this is Iago macrocosm black he is implying that Michael Cassio has no experience or idea of war. Iago speaks on talking about Michael Cassio by ill-usageing where he is from, say that he is a Florentine.He is dictum that Cassio the Florentine knows nothing of war. This displays Iago of being racially prejudiced to foreigners and outsiders. This is the same for Othello there may be a reason to wherefore Cassio was chosen over Iago as Cassio an d Othello are both(prenominal) outsiders. Iago definitions on Cassio, of being a fellow almost damned in a fair wife. This reveals that he may be sexually jealous of Cassio, as many women are attracted to him. Iago continues on, to once more insult Cassio even more saying that neer set a squadron in the field, nor the partition of a battle knows more than a spinster, unless the bookish theoric. This shows that he may be upset about being passed over for promotion, and his abhorrence for Cassio. I reckon from what I ingest telln from what Iago says about Cassio, he may intuitive feeling intellectly inferior to Cassio as he says as masterly as he is screening that Iago may feel he has been challenged by someone better and more academic than him.This is the audiences first scrape of professional jealousy. Iago then finally ends this linguistic communication with a sardonic phrase of his moorship this is a derogatory connotation, which is a play on the phrase his worship. I ago proves to Roderigo proficient how much he hates Othello, by insulting him and by slandering Cassio. With all of this hatred Iago has he causes the d perception of Cassio, the murder of Desdemona, the self-destruction of Othello and the downfall of himself. Our visions of Othello are all shaped by what Iago says in his dialogue with Roderigo. The audience may become doubtful of what Iago says as his views are amoral.There are important lines from this long savoir-faire revealing Iagos real character. But the main theme of this speech is how he hates Othello, and his lack of true the true and integrity. Moreover he tells Roderigo his figure and how it leave behind affect him Roderigo follows Iago foolishly not eyesight that he is being utilise because of his lust to possess Desdemona. This speech also shows how Iago is cap competent to ingeniously manipulate people. He begins to say I follow him to serve my turn upon him this is basically showing how is only component Ot hello to help himself and using it for his advantage.This shows that Iago is ambitious as he knows what he wants, and does anything to get it. Also he is dis in asperseible and self-serving as he is just getting what he wants out of his put throughs, and is betraying his so called friend Othello. In addition he is cunning and sly getting exactly what he wants, by deceiving people. He says an important line which is promised land is my judge, not I for love and duty this shows that Iago is not interested in love and does not really care about it. He has no concept of love. This malarkeys to the later point of his attitude towards women in general.He also says the blasphemous phrase of I am not what I am this shows that he is loss against Gods words of I am what I am. This shows that he once again is mocking of Christian values and of Christ. But this line could also be showing that Iago may hit a layer to his character, which is unseen by other people. We whoremaster see tha t what Roderigo says is an echo of how Iago speaks, especially about Othello. We visualize Roderigo say a racist comment about Othello, the thick-lips owe. This is a phrase which is mirror from the path Iago addresses Othello.Iago is manipulating people to become like him, villainy. Iago feels he needs to instigate his plan and tells Roderigo to rouse Brabantio, make after him, envenom his delight, proclaim him in the streets. This shows that Iago delights in make trouble and enjoys stage managing bedlam. Roderigo is polite and var. in talking to the senator, getting them nowhere so it is Iagos gross(a) and disgusting descriptions of an old black ram, is tupping your white ewe which make Brabantio irate. The physical imagery here is representing the sexual friendship between Desdemona the noble women with the Moor general Othello.This sexual reference is then linked with the shadow of Cassio being a fellow almost damned in a fair wife, and with his job to help match up Roderigo and Desdemona. This shows that Iago thinks of women to be objects, and disregards love. He is un open to project love, or the relationships between men and women. We provoke see from this scene that Iago is able to control and manipulate people to his own advantage. From this scene altogether we see that Iago is a misanthropical malcontent. He is malicious in his acts and harsh with his language, he is able to manipulate people for his own needs, and exaggerates situations to his own advantage.We see how he despises men who wear their hearts on their sleeves, and who dont look out for their own interests. He likes people, who are self-serving, and people who do evil deeds for money, people who are devious and who pretend to be adept. His speeches in these scenes are energetic and shocking to many audiences, they are full of egotistical disgust. Furthermore Iago has an underhand way of being absent when actions which he has instigated come to head. Iago is a compellin g and advanced(a) villain. In this play there are two main scenes where Iago puts his Machiavellian plans in to operation.Iagos plans are malicious he puts his plans into action in act 2 scene 3, and in act 3 scene 3. In act 2 scene 3 all of Iagos tactics and ideas become reality. Upon arrival in Cyprus Iago persuades Cassio to have a drink by saying come, lieutenant, I have a stoup of wine. Cassio keeps on refusing Iagos offers, as he has very short and unhappy brains for drinking. But Cassio is not able to resist it, and takes some wine, causing him to become full of affray and offensive activity. Iago perceives this as his take a prospect to instigate his plan. Continuing to manipulate Roderigo effortlessly, he makes him start off a quarrel and a brawl with Cassio.Cassio gets wound up by Roderigo, as Roderigo gives witty remarks like beat me? These comments from Roderigo and the fact that he is rummy cause Cassio to get aggravated, and therefore fight. Othello gets ale rted by the brawl, and finds Montano and Cassio fighting. Montano is hurt, zounds I bleed still. Othello asks honest Iago to find out what happened. This is dramatic irony as Othello thinks that Iago is an honest person, whereas the audience knows that he is not, that he is crude and evil. This puts the audience in the sit of knowing more than the characters, increasing tension.Othello dismisses Cassio from his position, and he is exposed, just as Iago wanted. As Cassio is dismissed, Iago gets the chance to take his place, and get access to Othello so he can poison and corrupt his mind with his words. Iago speaks and acts in this scene as if he always has someone elses interests at heart. He enjoys presenting himself in the dress hat likely light. In this scene as Othello is being informed on the brawl by Iago, Iago acts as if he wants to help Cassio, he says to Othello I had rather have this expectoration cut from my mouth than it should do offence to Michael Cassio. This is all part of Iagos plan to make himself look trustworthy and leal, towards Othello. He here seems to be reluctant to accuse Cassio.This is not only to make Iago look loyal, but also to make Othello see how dishonorably his lieutenant has acted. Othello likes to here the direct truth, even though he appreciates the false protection of Cassio, minded(p) by Iago. We see Iagos ingenious and despiteful ideas when he decides to use Desdemona, who is innocent, and who he has no quarrel with, to enmesh them all. We see how blithe he is in his speech, that he has the intelligence agency and power to turn Desdemonas virtue into pitch. As before we see how Iago dislikes honesty and innocence. Even Iagos wife Emilia, is fooled in thinking that Iago wants to help Michael Cassio. Iagos only loyalty is to himself. Iagos imagery is crude, he will convince Othello that all the meetings that Iago and Desdemona are having, is an intimacy. He is planting the seeds of jealousy into Othellos mind. He tries to convince him that his wife wants Cassio, and that she will unbrace her credit with the Moor. In this scene Iago disrupts Othellos wedding ceremony night, and Iago turns Othello against the people he indisputable and loved. proceed 3 scene 3 is the gelid scene where Iago puts his Machiavellian plans into operation. Iago wants Othello to perceive that Cassio is having an affair with Cassio. Iago in this scene once again is pretending to be friends with Cassio. Iago knows exactly how Othello operates, and so he knows how to get inside his head. Iago tries to invalidate answering Othellos questions directly. He does this as he knows this builds up suspicion in Othellos mind. He also often imitates Othellos questions as he Othello says is he honest. Subsequently Iago avoids the question and says honest my lord This is another technique that Iago uses to give notice suspicion from Othello. Iago when talking to Othello about Desdemona repeatedly reminds him how she had deceitfully behaved, and the painful reminder that he is an outsider. Iago tells Othello that she could have made other natural choices. Iago keeps angering Othello by manipulating and poisoning his mind. Iago tells Othello look to your wife advert her well with Cassio where your eyes thus, not jealous nor secure. He essentially tells Othello to see his wife neutrally, and not to get furious when sounding upon her with Cassio.Another way that Iago tries to persuade Othello is by saying she did deceive her father, and when she seemd to shake and tutelage your looks. Iago here tries to show Othello that she is not loyal and noble, as she already deceived her father by marrying him, because of what she wanted. So Iago is questioning Othello, on what is stop her from doing it again. Iago pretends to care about Othello as he says trust me I fear it has. I hope you will consider what is speak comes from my love. He is telling Othello that he has his best interests at heart.After I ago knows that the poison he gave to Othello through words has held, and once Othello has become vengeful, he knows he must take the role of being a noble and loyal friend. There is irony here as Othello is seeking to kill Cassio he is carrying out Iagos revenge for him. WE find out from this scene that Othello is weak and insecure, as the emotion of love that he has for Desdemona loses against Iagos crude language. Othello left hand alone he wonders Why did I marry? This shows that he already knows that his wife is false.He begins to speak of the curse of mating. Although he resists Iagos version of Desdemona, it is the fake story of Cassio having a dream about her which breaks him. He returns angry much more angry with his words, but still does not know what to confide I think my wife be honest, and think she is not. But we see from the crude images conjuring in his mind, and the violence of his speech that Iago is winning. He speaks violently of poison, or fire, or suffocat ing streams. He curses death and damnation and says ferociously Ill tear her all to pieces. We see here that Iago has fully corrupted his mind, and Othello like Roderigo is descent to talk with crude and malicious language, just like Iago. Iagos plans in act 3 scene 3 are successful, as he is able to demote Cassio from his position. Iago is able to successfully play a event of roles, and is able to adapt his tone and behavior to suit any occasion. In this scene Iago acts apparently loyal, and as if he has everybody elses interests at heart. He presents himself as a noble friend to Cassio, and in the best contingent light. From discrediting Cassio, Iago is able to get close to Othello.This then means that he is able to corrupt and poison Othellos mind, with his crude words. The demotion weakens Othellos position, and gives Iago a great advantage to put his wicked plan into operation. As Iago gains access to Othellos mind from Cassio, he is able to use his skills in manipulation, to make Othello see things that are not real happening. He makes Othello perceive that Cassio is having an affair with Desdemona, and that she is being unfaithful towards him. Also he makes Othello demote Cassio because of a brawl, which Roderigo initiated.These events, which are stage managed by Iago all lead to the tragic denouement, Othello and Desdemonas deaths. The way he acts in this scene is quasi(prenominal) to the way he acts in act 1 scene, as he pretends to have Roderigos interests at heart in act 1 scene 1, and in act 2 scene 3 he acts as if he has Cassios interests at heart. In both scenes he appears to be loyal to his friends, when he is actually fooling everyone and is only loyal to himself. Also in both of these scenes he is always manipulating people, just to see the downfall of Othello.Part of Iagos success in act 2 scene 3 lies in the fact that he tells all of his victims exactly what they want to hear, or he uses arguments which would make his victims think li ke him, in a crude malicious manner. dress 3 scene 3 is the icy point in the play because Othello is confident(p) of his wifes corruption Othello makes a sacred expletive never to change his mind about her or to soften his feelings towards her until he acts out a violent revenge. At this point, Othello is fixed in his course, and the disastrous ending of the play is unavoidable.Othello swears to Iago that he will kill Desdemona and Cassio. scarcely as the play interchanges the security of sleep with the anxiety of domestic strife, Othello replaces the security of his spousal relationship with the hateful paranoia of an alliance with Iago. Iago is the one who causes Othellos downfall, as he sows the seeds of suspicion in his mind. Iagos methods in this scene are more subtle. He pretends to be reluctant to speak. Desdemona keeps irritating Othello, by asking when he will restore Cassio. This angers Othello as he is already shady of Cassio having an affair with Desdemona.Iago persistently acts as if he is protect Cassio. Othello becomes more and more shadowed from what Iago tells him, and Iago uses key words which get to Othello, for example think and honest. We can see how Iago falsely protects Cassio as he says, I think Cassios an honest man. Iago is protecting Cassio and not telling Othello the direct truth. This causes Othello to feel more suspicious of Cassio. Iago tells Othello about how Cassio and Desdemona have occultly been meeting, and so when Othello perceives it himself he becomes infuriated.Othello gives the secret of his downfall to Iago. This is Othellos flaw. Othello says when I love thee not, chaos is come again. The significance is that if Othello stops loving Desdemona he will disintegrate, and crumble to pieces. Iago now has something to act on, and can exploit this feeling, to poison and destruct Othello. Iagos final words in this scene chillingly mock the language of love and marriage I am your own forever. Iago is a malicio us, malevolent and crude person. He is able to manipulate, and twist peoples feelings to his own advantage.He is pictorial at stage managing events, and is capable of hoodwinking others to believe he is honest. When Iago speaks in his soliloquies he is boastful and dismissive. Iago is a very untrustworthy character, as we have seen from how he has fooled everyone to trust him. Iago is a complex character, only himself and the audience knows what he is really like. In this play we see how Iago is able to put his skills of manipulation into act. umteen believe he may have a homosexual side and tries to replace Desdemona, but this is only some views as his relationship with Othello is very complicated.Iago is highly intellectual socially. In this play he is the beater off death and pain upon many characters, he is like the grim reaper. Iago is partly responsible for bringing death to Othello, but it is not all his fault. It is true that he used his skills to manipulate people, and his ability to poison and corrupt peoples minds to bring Othellos downfall, but it is also the faults of the people he manipulated, for being weak minded. Roderigo, who was firstly manipulated, followed Iago as his drive and passion to possess Desdemona got in the way.Cassios flaw was that he only became manipulated as he believed Iago was his true friend, and that he was there to help him, he was also excessively trusting. Desdemona also had a fatal flaw, which was that she could be deceitful also she loved and trusted Othello to a great extent. Finally Iagos superlative achievement was convincing and manipulating Othello. Othello has the most evidentiary fatal flaw he had a high amount of jealousy. Iago was able to exploit all of these weaknesses. But the biggest was Othellos which all lead to the catastrophic deaths of Othello and his Desdemona.